Hot Topic: Bad Content Consumption Is Still Consumption?

 

Liking Bad Content Ironically Doesn’t Make It Good — It Just Makes You Complicit


At Docere sententia, we deal in uncomfortable truths, not internet coping mechanisms. So let’s dismantle one of the laziest habits of modern pop culture: ironic consumption — the idea that liking bad content ironically somehow absolves you from responsibility.

It doesn’t.

Liking something ironically doesn’t make it smart, subversive, or harmless. It makes it successful.

And success is the only language the algorithm speaks.


The Lie of “I Know It’s Bad”

“I know it’s trash, that’s why it’s funny.”

That sentence has done more cultural damage than most censorship laws.

The modern internet is built on plausible deniability. People want the dopamine hit of consumption without the moral or intellectual accountability that comes with taste. So they invent irony as a shield.

But platforms don’t measure intent. They measure:

  • Views

  • Watch time

  • Shares

  • Engagement

The algorithm doesn’t care if you laughed at it or with it. It registers the same signal: this content deserves amplification.

Irony doesn’t confuse the machine — it feeds it.

When you stream the bad movie “just to see how awful it is,” you are not critiquing culture. You are subsidizing it.


Ironic Consumption Is Still Cultural Endorsement


Every era has had bad art. The difference now is scale.

In previous generations, bad content failed quietly. Today, it fails upward — rewarded with memes, reaction videos, podcasts, and “so bad it’s good” discourse that stretches its lifespan indefinitely.

Your ironic attention does three things:

  1. It keeps the content visible

  2. It trains recommendation systems to push similar material

  3. It crowds out better work that doesn’t generate spectacle

Mockery used to kill bad art. Now it keeps it on life support.

The industry doesn’t care why you’re watching — only that you are.


The Cultural Cowardice Behind Irony

Let’s be honest: irony is rarely about critique. It’s about avoiding commitment.

To like something sincerely risks judgment. To dislike something seriously requires articulation. Irony lets people hover above culture without taking a stance.

You don’t have to defend your taste if you pretend you don’t really have any.

That posture has consequences.

When everything is consumed ironically:

  • Standards collapse

  • Criticism becomes vibes

  • Taste becomes performance

Irony is what happens when people are afraid to care in public.

Bad content thrives in that vacuum.


The “So Bad It’s Good” Scam


Some defenders argue that ironic enjoyment creates a separate category — that bad content can transcend itself through communal mockery.

That argument worked once. Maybe twice.

But now it’s a business model.

Studios, influencers, and creators intentionally produce low-effort, outrageous, or incompetent material because they know irony will carry it. Rage bait, cringe bait, and hate-watching are no longer accidents — they are strategies.

When bad content knows it’s bad, it stops being accidental and starts being cynical.

The audience thinks it’s in on the joke. The platform is the one laughing.


Algorithms Don’t Understand Jokes — They Understand Patterns


This is where the illusion collapses.

Digital culture is not governed by human nuance. It is governed by automated systems that convert attention into profit.

The algorithm cannot distinguish:

  • Hate-watchers from fans

  • Critics from supporters

  • Irony from sincerity

It sees momentum — and rewards it.

So while you’re congratulating yourself for “watching ironically,” the system is busy:

  • Funding sequels

  • Boosting clones

  • Replacing quality with quantity

You didn’t break the system. You trained it.


Complicity Isn’t Neutral — It’s Active

Complicity doesn’t require enthusiasm. It requires participation.

Every click is a vote. Every stream is a signal. Every share is an endorsement — regardless of tone.

You don’t get moral distance just because you rolled your eyes while watching.

You can’t mock your way out of responsibility.

If bad content keeps winning, it’s not because standards disappeared. It’s because people keep rewarding what they claim to hate.


The Cost: What We Lose When Everything Is a Joke

When irony dominates culture:

  • Sincere art is dismissed as “trying too hard”

  • Thoughtful criticism is replaced by dunking

  • Mediocrity becomes indistinguishable from parody

The result isn’t liberation. It’s stagnation.

Bad content doesn’t improve. Good content struggles to survive. And audiences become passive consumers of whatever generates the strongest reaction — not the deepest thought.

A culture that laughs at everything eventually stands for nothing.


Final Verdict: Choose Better or Own the Consequences


This isn’t a call for purity. It’s a call for honesty.

If you like something, own it.
If you hate something, stop feeding it.
If you claim it’s beneath you, act like it.

Because ironic consumption doesn’t undermine bad content.

It funds it.

And if culture feels worse, cheaper, and emptier than it used to — that’s not just the creators’ fault.

It’s the audience’s reflection staring back at them.

Care less about looking clever.
Care more about what you reward.

Because the algorithm is always watching — and it believes you.